Applying AHP in Evaluation of Vietnamese Commercial Banks

Main Article Content

Thanh-Tuyen Tran

Abstract

Bank rankings are one of the ways to rate the bank system and to create competitive advantages, which have emerged as the central issue and considered as one of the most important organizational innovation. This research is objective to explore and to demonstrate utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) application in banking for the purpose of proposing suitable model for partners evaluation and selecting banking strategic alliances in Vietnam. The AHP is applied to examine what criteria should be encompassed in evaluating and examining the importance weightings of influential criteria when ranking the bank system. In this study, a short review of literature regarding application AHP in banking decision-making is presented, focusing on partner evaluation criteria and methods to propose model for partner evaluation and selecting strategic banking for the current study. After a long process of calculation based on AHP, I have come up with the final rankings according expert's interview: ACB's percentages have change widely from each sub-criterion; finally it gets 12.98% at the top of the list. Coming very closely downwards are DAB, SeAbank etc., at the bottom of the rankings is SGB at 7.41%. By this paper, author would contribute to the ranking process of the banking system, in general, and the special case of Vietnamese banking a very modern model to apply, then to choose the right alliance for further cooperation, not only for banking system but it can be applied for a lot of industries.

Article Details

References

  1. Yong-gang, C. U. I. (2004), A Method Based AHP: To Choose the Best Strategic Alliance Partner
  2. [J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce, 1, 004.
  3. Korhonen, P., &Voutilainen, R. (2006), Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1285-1299.
  4. Wang, T. C., & Lin, Y. L. (2009), Applying the consistent fuzzy preference relations to select merger strategy for commercial banks in new financial environments. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7019-7026.
  5. N. T. Nguyen and T. T. Tran, Optimizing mathematical parameters of Grey system theory: An empirical forecasting case of Vietnamese tourism. Neural Comput.Appl., (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3058-9.
  6. T. T. Tran, Evaluating and forecasting performance using past data of an industry: An analysis of electronic manufacturing services industry. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., 3(12) (2016a), 5-20.
  7. Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., &Kahraman, C. (2009), Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.
  8. Ho, A., & Baxter, R. A. (2011), Banking reform in Vietnam. Asia focus, (June).
  9. Min, D. M., Kim, J. R., Kim, W. C., Min, D., & Ku, S. (1996), IBRS: Intelligent bank reengineering system. Decision Support Systems, 18(1), 97-105.
  10. N. T. Nguyen and T. T. Tran, Mathematical development and evaluation of forecasting models for accuracy of inflation in developing countries: A case of Vietnam. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2015.
  11. N. T. Nguyen and T. T. Tran, Raising opportunities in strategic alliance by evaluating efficiency of logistics companies in Vietnam: A case of Cat Lai Port. Neural Comput. Appl., (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3639-2.
  12. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., &Kajanus, M. (2000), Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis””a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.
  13. Saaty, T. L. (2008), Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
  14. Ngai, E. W. T. (2003), Selection of web sites for online advertising using the AHP. Information & Management, 40(4), 233-242.
  15. Salmeron, J. L., &Herrero, I. (2005), An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 28(1), 1-12.
  16. Yu, H. C., Lee, Z. Y., & Chang, S. C. (2005), Using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate alternative licensing mechanisms. Information& management, 42(4), 517-531.
  17. Korhonen, P., & Voutilainen, R. (2006), Finding the most preferred alliance structure between banks and insurance companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), 1285-1299.
  18. Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., &Kahraman, C. (2009), Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11699-11709.
  19. Arbel, A., &Orgler, Y. E. (1990), An application of the AHP to bank strategic planning: The mergers and acquisitions process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 27-37.
  20. Chen, Z., & Tan, J. (2011), Does bancassurance add value for banks? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions between European banks and insurance companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 25(1), 104-112.
  21. Sevkli, Mehmet.,Koh, S.C. Lenny., Zaim, Selim., Demirbag, Mehmet., Tatoglu, Ekrem. (2008), Hybrid analytical hierarchy process model for supplier selection. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 108 No. 1. Pages 122-142.
  22. T. T. Tran, Forecasting strategies and analyzing the numbers of incoming students: Case in Taiwanese vocational schools. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., 4(9) (2017), 86-95.
  23. T. T. Tran, A strategic alliance study by performance evaluation and forecasting techniques: A case in the petroleum industry. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., 5(2) (2018), 136-147.
  24. N. T. Nguyen and T. T. Tran, A two-stage study of grey system theory and DEA in strategic alliance: An application in Vietnamese fertilizing industry. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., 5(9) (2018a), 73-81.
  25. T. T. Tran, Evaluating and forecasting performance using past data of an industry: An analysis of electronic manufacturing services industry. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., 3(12) (2016b), 5-20.