Second Hankel Determinant for Analytic Functions Defined by Ruscheweyh Derivative

Yavuz, T.

Research Article

Second Hankel Determinant for Analytic Functions Defined by Ruscheweyh Derivative

T. Yavuz¹

Gebze Technical University

Abstract

Let S denote the class of analytic and univalent functions in the open unit disk D= {z:|z|<1} with the normalization conditions. In the present article an upper bound for the second Hankel determinant |aâ‚‚aâ‚„-a₃ ²| is obtained for the analytic functions defined by Ruscheweyh derivative.

How to Cite

T. Yavuz, Second Hankel Determinant for Analytic Functions Defined by Ruscheweyh Derivative, Int. J. Anal. Appl. 8 (2015), 63–68.

BibTeX

@article{Yavuz2015,
  author  = {Yavuz, T.},
  title   = {Second Hankel Determinant for Analytic Functions Defined by Ruscheweyh Derivative},
  journal = {Int. J. Anal. Appl.},
  volume  = {8},
  year    = {2015},
  pages   = {63--68},
  doi     = {}
}

References

[1] P. L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1983.
[2] R. Ehrenborg, The Hankel determinant of exponantial polynomials. American Mathematical Monthly, 107 (2000), 557-560.
[3] M. Fekete and G. Szeg ¨o, Eine Bemerkung uber ungerade schlichte Funktionen, J. London Math. Soc, 8 (1933), 85-89.
[4] U. Grenander and G. Szeg ¨o, Toeplitz forms and their application, Univ. of Calofornia Press, Berkely and Los Angeles, (1958).
[5] T. Hayami and S. Owa, Hankel determinant for p-valently starlike and convex functions of order α, General Math., 17 (2009), 29-44.
[6] T. Hayami and S. Owa, Generalized Hankel determinant for certain classes, Int. J. Math. Anal., 4 (2010), 2573-2585.
[7] A. Janteng, S. A. Halim, and M. Darus, Coefficient inequality for a function whose derivative has positive real part, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math, 7 (2) (2006), 1-5.
[8] A. Janteng, Halim, S. A. and Darus, M. : Hankel Determinant For Starlike and Convex Functions, Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, I (13) (2007), 619-625.
[9] J. W. Layman, The Hankel transform and some of its properties. J. of integer sequences, 4 (2001), 1-11.
[10] R.J. Libera, and E.J. Zlotkiewicz, Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex function, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 85(2) (1982), 225-230.
[11] R.J. Libera, and E.J. Zlotkiewicz, Coefficient bounds for the inverse of a function with derivative in P, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 87(2) (1983), 251-289.
[12] G. Murugusundaramoorthy and N. Magesh, Coefficient Inequalities For Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Hankel Determinant, Bulletin of Math. Anal. Appl., I (3) (2009), 85-89.
[13] J. W. Noonan and D. K. Thomas, On the second Hankel Determinant of a really mean p valent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 223 (2) (1976), 337-346.
[14] K. I. Noor, Hankel determinant problem for the class of functions with bounded boundary rotation. Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Et Appl, 28 (8) (1983), 731-739.
[15] S. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1975) 109- 115.
[16] R. Singh, S. Singh, Integrals of certain univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1979) 336-340.
[17] S. C. Soh and D. Mohamad, Coefficient Bounds For Certain Classes of Close-to-Convex Functions, Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, 2 (27) (2008), 1343-1351.
[18] T. Yavuz, Second hankel determinant problem for a certain subclass of univalent functions, International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 9(10), (2015), 493 - 498.