Prioritizing Factors of Organizational Cultural Model in Electronic Enterprises

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-22-2024-161
Published: Sep 26, 2024
Cite as:
Luc Manh Hien, Nguyen Quang Vinh, Prioritizing Factors of Organizational Cultural Model in Electronic Enterprises, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 22 (2024), 161.

Main Article Content

Luc Manh Hien, Nguyen Quang Vinh

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the priority order of organizational cultural factors affecting the competitiveness of electronic enterprises. The methodology adopted for this research comprises the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) method. Data collection was sent to 15 experts, including university scientists, government regulators, and managers of electronic enterprises. The results revealed that the first ranking belongs to the involvement factor, the second-ranked factor is a mission, and the third position is consistency and adaptability.  The results showed that experts' top three indicators of influential competitiveness ratings included core values, customer focus, and vision. Meanwhile, the three lowest-rated factors include agreement, organizational learning, coordination, and integration. This research's practical and theoretical implications are discussed, providing insights into how the results can be applied or influence practices in organizational culture in electronic enterprises.

Article Details

References

  1. D.R. Denison, A.K. Mishra, Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness, Organ. Sci. 6 (1995), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.204.
  2. C.F. Fey, D.R. Denison, Organizational Culture and Effectiveness: Can American Theory Be Applied in Russia?, Organ. Sci. 14 (2003), 686–706. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.686.24868.
  3. D.R. Denison, J. Janovics, J. Young, H.J. Cho, Diagnosing Organizational Cultures: Validating a Model and Method, Documento de trabajo, Denison Consulting Group, pp. 1-39, (2006).
  4. E. Uchida, Y. Kino, Study on the Relationship Between Corporate Culture and Corporate Performance in IT industry in Japan via Text Mining, Procedia Comp. Sci. 225 (2023), 1834–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.173.
  5. K. Li, X. Liu, F. Mai, T. Zhang, The Role of Corporate Culture in Bad Times: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic, J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 56 (2021), 2545–2583. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109021000326.
  6. M. Aboramadan, B. Albashiti, H. Alharazin, S. Zaidoune, Organizational Culture, Innovation and Performance: A Study from a Non-Western Context, J. Manage. Develop. 39 (2019), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-06-2019-0253.
  7. A. Zeb, F. Akbar, K. Hussain, A. Safi, M. Rabnawaz, F. Zeb, The Competing Value Framework Model of Organizational Culture, Innovation and Performance, Bus. Process Manage. J. 27 (2021), 658–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-11-2019-0464.
  8. J.A. Abane, R. Adamtey, V.O. Ayim, Does Organizational Culture Influence Employee Productivity at the Local Level? A Test of Denison’s Culture Model in Ghana’s Local Government Sector, Future Bus. J. 8 (2022), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00145-5.
  9. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  10. T. Yaghoobi, Prioritizing Key Success Factors of Software Projects Using Fuzzy AHP, J. Software Evol. Process 30 (2017), e1891. https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.1891.
  11. S.A.H. Sani, M.V. Monfard, E. Sarfi, Knowledge Management Adoption to Financial Institutions Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Techniques, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 31 (2019), 215-248. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2019.100284.
  12. J. Ali, B. Roh, An Efficient Approach for Load balancing in Software-Defined Networks, in: 2021 6th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS), IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2021: pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCS51487.2021.9776348.
  13. H.M. Lyu, W.J. Sun, S.L. Shen, A.-N. Zhou, Risk Assessment Using a New Consulting Process in Fuzzy AHP, J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (2020), 04019112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001757.
  14. N. Çaglayan, A. Yildizbasi, B.D. Rouyendegh, Fuzzy AHP Approach to Prioritizing the Critical Success Factors of Organizational Culture, Int. J. Organ. Leadership 7 (2018), 454–466. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60456.
  15. X. Wu, H. Jia, The Evaluation Model of Construction Enterprises Culture Development Based on FAHP, SHS Web Conf. 17 (2015), 01022. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20151701022.
  16. M. Amiri, M. Mohajeri, Ranking Occupations in High-Rise Construction Workshops from the View Point of Safety Culture Using FTOPSIS-FAHP Model, J. Health Safe. Work 7 (2017), 131-142.
  17. G.B. Gorton, J. Grennan, A.K. Zentefis, Corporate Culture, Ann. Rev. Financ. Econ. 14 (2022), 535–561. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092321-124541.
  18. R. Andriyanty, F. Komalasari, D. Rambe, The Effect of Work from Home on Corporate Culture Mediated by Motivation, Work Behavior, and Performance, J. Aplikasi Manajemen 19 (2021), 522-534.
  19. D.K.V. Mullins, The Relationship between Leadership Styles and Organizational Culture within Schools of Nursing, Theses, Dissertations and Capstones, Marshall University, (2007). https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/773.
  20. W.G. Ouchi, A.L. Wilkins, Organizational Culture, Ann. Rev. Sociol. 11 (1985), 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.002325.
  21. C. Isensee, F. Teuteberg, K.M. Griese, C. Topi, The Relationship Between Organizational Culture, Sustainability, and Digitalization in SMEs: A Systematic Review, J. Cleaner Product. 275 (2020), 122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944.
  22. R.T. Naveed, H. Alhaidan, H.A. Halbusi, A.K. Al-Swidi, Do Organizations Really Evolve? The Critical Link Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Innovation toward Organizational Effectiveness: Pivotal Role of Organizational Resistance, J. Innov. Knowl. 7 (2022) 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100178.
  23. A. Widarko, M.K. Anwarodin, Work Motivation and Organizational Culture on Work Performance: Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) as Mediating Variable, Golden Ratio Human Resources Manage. 2 (2022), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v2i2.207.
  24. D. Denison, Corporate Culture and Organizational, Wiley, 1990.
  25. S. Porwal, A Comparative Study of Corporate Culture between Firozabad Glass Industry and Other Glass Industry on the Basis of Denison Models' Trait (Mission), Educ. Admin.: Theory Practice 30 (2024), 8619-8624.
  26. S. Taneja, S.S. Sewell, R.Y. Odom, A Culture of Employee Engagement: A Strategic Perspective for Global Managers, J. Bus. Strat. 36 (2015), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-06-2014-0062.
  27. E. Schein, Organizational Culture and Leadership, 4th ed. Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, 2010.
  28. N.Q. Vinh, Q.H. Do, L.M. Hien, An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach in the Hotel Industry, Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 9 (2022), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2022.10.017.
  29. M. Jofreh, S.E. Masoumi, Diagnosing Organizational Culture: An Empirical Investigation, Manage. Sci. Lett. 3 (2013), 2461-2466, https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2013.08.018.
  30. S. Handari Wahyuningsih, A. Sudiro, E. Afnan Troena, D. W Irawanto, Analysis of Organizational Culture with Denison’s Model Approach for International Business Competitiveness, Probl. Perspect. Manage. 17 (2019), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.13.