Social Norms, Attitudes, Self-Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Moderating Roles of Education, Risk Tolerance, and Innovation Orientation

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-74
Published: Mar 24, 2025
Cite as:
Suchart Tripopsakul, Social Norms, Attitudes, Self-Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Intentions: Moderating Roles of Education, Risk Tolerance, and Innovation Orientation, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 23 (2025), 74.

Main Article Content

Suchart Tripopsakul

Abstract

Young people play an increasingly prominent role in economic activity, yet limited research investigates the factors shaping their entrepreneurial intentions, particularly in emerging economies. This study examines the relationships among perceived social norms (PSN), attitudes toward entrepreneurship (ATE), and self-efficacy (SNR) in influencing entrepreneurial intentions (EI) among youth. It also explores the moderating roles of entrepreneurial education (EE), risk tolerance (RT), and innovation orientation (IO) in these relationships. A quantitative research methodology was employed, utilizing an online questionnaire to collect data from 211 Thai university students. Findings reveal that PSN, ATE, and SNR significantly influence EI, with ATE emerging as the most critical factor, demonstrating the role of positive perceptions of entrepreneurship as a viable career path in enhancing intentions. Moderation analyses indicate that entrepreneurial education strengthens the relationship between PSN and EI, and risk tolerance amplifies the impact of SNR on EI. However, the moderating effect of innovation orientation on the relationship between ATE and EI was not supported. These findings highlight the importance of education and individual characteristics, such as risk tolerance, in shaping entrepreneurial intentions while indicating limits to innovation orientation's role in this context. This study provides actionable insights for educators, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to foster entrepreneurial activity among youth in emerging economies, emphasizing the need for targeted educational initiatives and supportive environments to cultivate entrepreneurial skills, confidence, and attitudes.

Article Details

References

  1. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, GEM 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (2022). https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-20212022-global-report-opportunity-amid-disruption.
  2. J.A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1934.
  3. U. Guelich, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Thailand Report 2019/2020, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, (2020). https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-thailand-report-201920.
  4. D. Urbano, D. Audretsch, S. Aparicio, M. Noguera, Does Entrepreneurial Activity Matter for Economic Growth in Developing Countries? The Role of the Institutional Environment, Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 16 (2020), 1065–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00621-5.
  5. N. Wathanakom, J. Khlaisang, N. Songkram, A Journey to Enhance Youth in Entrepreneurship: Investigation of Entrepreneurial Competencies and Development Needs, J. Educ. Innov. 23 (2021), 64–78.
  6. World Economic Forum, The Future of Jobs Report 2023, Geneva, 2023. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023.
  7. OECD, Entrepreneurship Policies through a Gender Lens, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2021.
  8. I. Ajzen, The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50 (1991), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  9. A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psychol. Rev. 84 (1977), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  10. T. Kautonen, M. Van Gelderen, M. Fink, Robustness of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions, Entrep. Theory Pract. 39 (2015), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056.
  11. F. Liñán, A. Fayolle, A Systematic Literature Review on Entrepreneurial Intentions: Citation, Thematic Analyses, and Research Agenda, Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 11 (2015), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-015-0356-5.
  12. V. Souitaris, S. Zerbinati, A. Al-Laham, Do Entrepreneurship Programmes Raise Entrepreneurial Intention of Science and Engineering Students? The Effect of Learning, Inspiration and Resources, J. Bus. Venturing 22 (2007), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002.
  13. G. Nabi, F. Liñán, A. Fayolle, N. Krueger, A. Walmsley, The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda, Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 16 (2017), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026.
  14. D. Kahneman, A. Tversky, Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica 47 (1979), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
  15. H. Zhao, S.E. Seibert, G.E. Hills, The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions., J. Appl. Psychol. 90 (2005), 1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265.
  16. S. Shane, S. Venkataraman, The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research, Acad. Manag. Rev. 25 (2000), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.
  17. A. Fayolle, B. Gailly, The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Intention: Hysteresis and Persistence, J. Small Bus. Manag. 53 (2015), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065.
  18. F. Liñán, Y. Chen, Development and Cross–Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions, Entrep. Theory Pract. 33 (2009), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x.
  19. J.R. Anderson, The Role of Subjective Norms in Developing Entrepreneurial Intentions in University Students, J. Strategy Manag. 16 (2023), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2022-0190.
  20. G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2001.
  21. R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being., Amer. Psychol. 55 (2000), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
  22. F. Wilson, J. Kickul, D. Marlino, Gender, Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Career Intentions: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education, Entrep. Theory Pract. 31 (2007), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x.
  23. A. Newman, M. Obschonka, S. Schwarz, M. Cohen, I. Nielsen, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Its Theoretical Foundations, Measurement, Antecedents, and Outcomes, and an Agenda for Future Research, J. Vocat. Behav. 110 (2019), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012.
  24. S.B. Sitkin, L.R. Weingart, Determinants of Risky Decision-Making Behavior: A Test of the Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions and Propensity, Acad. Manag. J. 38 (1995), 1573–1592. https://doi.org/10.2307/256844.
  25. J.F. Hair, W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson, New York, 2010.
  26. C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, J. Mark. Res. 18 (1981), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.