University Rankings Prediction Using Hybrid Feature Selection Based on Machine Learning Methods

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-23-2025-112
Published: May 8, 2025
Cite as:
Kittipol Wisaeng, Benchalak Muangmeesri, University Rankings Prediction Using Hybrid Feature Selection Based on Machine Learning Methods, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 23 (2025), 112.

Main Article Content

Kittipol Wisaeng, Benchalak Muangmeesri

Abstract

This study presents a novel approach to predicting university rankings using hybrid feature selection and machine learning techniques. It identifies critical performance factors that affect ranking accuracy using the Times Higher Education (THE) dataset, which includes data from 1,904 universities. A Max-Min normalization method and an artificial neural network were applied to preprocess the data. Then, a hybrid feature selection method, combining statistical and machine learning techniques, was used to determine the optimal feature subsets. Several prediction models, including linear regression, random forest, and multilayer perceptron, were evaluated and compared based on various metrics: accuracy, precision, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and R². The results indicate that hybrid feature selection using machine learning significantly enhances predictive accuracy. The hybrid model consistently outperformed all other models across various metrics, achieving the highest accuracy (0.971), precision (0.985), recall (0.971), and F1-score (0.972). These results demonstrate that the hybrid model effectively balances true positive and false positive predictions while minimizing errors. Furthermore, the error metrics for the hybrid model were the lowest among all models, with an MAE of 0.034 and an RMSE of 0.028. This reinforces its superiority in delivering highly reliable predictions. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of hybrid feature selection in refining ranking systems and offers a robust framework that can be applied to various datasets and ranking environments. The findings provide valuable insights for improving ranking predictions and shaping strategies in higher education.

Article Details

References

  1. E. Tavoletti, F. Şahin, V. Taras, et al. A Configurational Analysis of University Ranking, Cognitive Ability and Cultural Intelligence in Global Virtual Teams: The Role of Academic Pedigree, Int. J. Manag. Educ. 22 (2024), 101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101040.
  2. W. Xu, Z. Yang, Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation-Based Feature Selection for Multiple Source Ordered Information Systems, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 142 (2025), 109935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109935.
  3. I.D. Stanciu, N. Nistor, Doctoral Capstone Theories as Indicators of University Rankings: Insights from a Machine Learning Approach, Comput. Human Behav. 164 (2025), 108504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108504.
  4. L.J. Wardley, E. Rajabi, S.H. Amin, M. Ramesh, A Machine Learning Approach Feature to Forecast the Future Performance of the Universities in Canada, Mach. Learn. Appl. 16 (2024), 100548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100548.
  5. Z. Meng, R. Lin, B. Wu, Graph Neural Networks-Based Preference Learning Method for Object Ranking, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 167 (2024), 109131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109131.
  6. H. Wang, X. Yu, A Ranking Improved Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm for Parameters Identification of Photovoltaic Models, Appl. Soft Comput. 167 (2024), 112371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112371.
  7. S. Wang, Y. Wu, B.J. Gao, K. Wang, H.W. Lauw, J. Ma, A Cooperative Coevolution Framework for Parallel Learning to Rank, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 27 (2015), 3152–3165. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2015.2453952.
  8. V.R. Yeravdekar, G. Tiwari, Global Rankings of Higher Education Institutions and India’s Effective Non-Presence: Why Have World-Class Universities Eluded the Indian Higher Education System? And, How Worthwhile Is the Indian Government’s Captivation to Launch World Class Universities?, Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 157 (2014), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.010.
  9. A.P. Pavel, Global University Rankings - A Comparative Analysis, Procedia Econ. Finance 26 (2015), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2.
  10. E. Tavoletti, F. Şahin, V. Taras, W. Farrell, L. Florea, A Configurational Analysis of University Ranking, Cognitive Ability and Cultural Intelligence in Global Virtual Teams: The Role of Academic Pedigree, Int. J. Manag. Educ. 22 (2024), 101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101040.
  11. E. Adam, ‘Governments Base Performance-Based Funding on Global Rankings Indicators’: A Global Trend in Higher Education Finance or a Global Rankings Literature Fiction? A Comparative Analysis of Four Performance-Based Funding Programs, Int. J. Educ. Dev. 76 (2020), 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102197.
  12. V.M. Moskovkin, E.V. Pupynina, N.P. Zaitseva, R.V. Lesovik, Methodology for Comparative Analysis of University Rankings, with the Mediterranean and Black Sea Region Countries Taken as an Example, Middle-East J. Sci. Res.18 (2013), 1656-1665.
  13. F.B. Ilhami, M. Khasanah, N. Suprapto, B.S. Widodo, Exploring Perspective of Impact Ranking University Trend in Five Universities in East Java Indonesia, Soc. Sci. Human. Open 11 (2025), 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101284.
  14. P.A. Pinto-Delacadena, V. Liern, P. Acosta-Vargas, A. Vinueza-Cabezas, A Multicriteria Approach to Ranking Latin-American Universities Based on Region-Specific Criteria, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 208 (2024), 123725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123725.
  15. T. Rafique, M.U. Awan, M. Shafiq, K. Mahmood, Exploring the Role of Ranking Systems towards University Performance Improvement: A Focus Group-Based Study, Heliyon 9 (2023), e20904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20904.
  16. K. Tamada, E. Jotaki, N. Tsukamoto, S. Sagara, J.N. Kondo, M. Mori, M. Waga, S. Brown, Evaluation of the Gender-Neutral Academic Climate on Campus for Women Faculty in STEM Fields, Int. J. Educ. Res. Open 7 (2024), 100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100390.
  17. J. Li, H. Wang, H. Luo, X. Jiang, E. Li, A Ranking Prediction Strategy Assisted Automatic Model Selection Method, Adv. Eng. Inform. 57 (2023), 102068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102068.
  18. I.D. Stanciu, N. Nistor, Doctoral Capstone Theories as Indicators of University Rankings: Insights from a Machine Learning Approach, Comput. Human Behav. 164 (2025), 108504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108504.
  19. C. Perez-Esparrells, E. Orduna-Malea, Do the Technical Universities Exhibit Distinct Behaviour in Global University Rankings? A Times Higher Education (THE) Case Study, J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 48 (2018), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.007.
  20. Y.S. Kim, M.K. Kim, N. Fu, J. Liu, J. Wang, J. Srebric, Investigating the Impact of Data Normalization Methods on Predicting Electricity Consumption in a Building Using Different Artificial Neural Network Models, Sustain. Cities Soc. 118 (2025), 105570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105570.
  21. A.M. Dalloo, A.J. Humaidi, Optimizing Machine Learning Models with Data-Level Approximate Computing: The Role of Diverse Sampling, Precision Scaling, Quantization and Feature Selection Strategies, Results Eng. 24 (2024), 103451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103451.
  22. O. Polushkina-Merchanskaya, M.D. Sorochan Armstrong, C. Gómez-Llorente, et al. Considerations for Missing Data, Outliers and Transformations in Permutation Testing for ANOVA with Multivariate Responses, Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 258 (2025), 105320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105320.
  23. H. Parastar, P. Weller, Feature Selection and Extraction Strategies for Non-Targeted Analysis Using GC-MS and GC-IMS: A Tutorial, Anal. Chim. Acta 1343 (2025), 343635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2025.343635.
  24. M. Taillardat, A.-L. Fougères, P. Naveau, R. De Fondeville, Evaluating Probabilistic Forecasts of Extremes Using Continuous Ranked Probability Score Distributions, Int. J. Forecast. 39 (2023), 1448–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.07.003.
  25. N. Gupta, S. Sivananthan, B.K. Sriperumbudur, Optimal Rates for Functional Linear Regression with General Regularization, Appl. Comput. Harm. Anal. 76 (2025), 101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2024.101745.
  26. L. Zhu, T. Yang, S. Li, F. Yang, C. Jiang, L. Xie, Experimental Investigation and Prediction of Chemical Etching Kinetics on Mask Glass Using Random Forest Machine Learning, Chem. Eng. Res. Design 213 (2025), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2024.12.014.
  27. I. Shomope, M. Tawalbeh, A. Al-Othman, F. Almomani, Predicting Biohydrogen Production from Dark Fermentation of Organic Waste Biomass Using Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network (MLP–ANN), Comput. Chem. Eng. 192 (2025), 108900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108900.
  28. S.S. Rana, S. Vichare, A. Gupta, A. Rajagopalan, O.P. Kharbanda, Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Simplified Hybrid Method versus the Traditional Digital Method for Measuring Palatal Volume, J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 15 (2025), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.10.011.
  29. J. Zhao, Z. Hou, Q. Wang, et al. YOLOrot2.0: A Novel Algorithm for High-Precision Rice Seed Size Measurement with Real-Time Processing, Smart Agric. Technol. 9 (2024), 100599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100599.
  30. S.J.J. Leemans, A. Polyvyanyy, Stochastic-Aware Precision and Recall Measures for Conformance Checking in Process Mining, Inf. Syst. 115 (2023), 102197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2023.102197.
  31. Z. DeVries, E. Locke, M. Hoda, et al. Using a National Surgical Database to Predict Complications Following Posterior Lumbar Surgery and Comparing the Area under the Curve and F1-Score for the Assessment of Prognostic Capability, Spine J. 21 (2021), 1135–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.007.
  32. Y. Tang, L. Shang, R. Zhang, J. Li, H. Fu, Hybrid Divergence Based on Mean Absolute Scaled Error for Incipient Fault Detection, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 129 (2024), 107662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107662.
  33. D.S.K. Karunasingha, Root Mean Square Error or Mean Absolute Error? Use Their Ratio as Well, Inf. Sci. 585 (2022), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.036.
  34. K. Taira, D. McInnes, L. Zhang, How Many Data Points and How Large an R-Squared Value Is Essential for Arrhenius Plots?, J. Catal. 419 (2023), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2023.01.033.