Digital Finance and Corporate ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Financing Constraints and Green Innovation-Evidence from Thai Listed Companies

Main Article Content

Thongpong Pongphanich, Kittima Ngamvilaikorn, Prajya Ngamjan

Abstract

This study examines the impact of digital finance on corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance in Thailand. Drawing upon stakeholder theory, agency theory, signaling theory, and the resource-based view, we propose a conceptual framework that integrates financing constraints and green innovation as mediating mechanisms. Using panel data from 523 companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) covering the period 2018-2024, yielding 3,320 firm-year observations, we employ multiple regression analysis to test the proposed hypotheses. The research addresses significant gaps in the existing literature by: (1) investigating the digital finance-ESG relationship in the underexplored context of Thai capital market, (2) examining the dual mediating pathways through which digital finance influences sustainability outcomes, and (3) considering the moderating role of family ownership structure. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on sustainable finance and provides practical implications for policymakers and corporate managers seeking to leverage digital financial technologies for sustainable development in emerging markets.

Article Details

References

  1. S.M. Hartzmark, A.B. Sussman, Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows, J. Financ. 74 (2019), 2789-2837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12841.
  2. J. Delgado-Ceballos, N. Ortiz-De-Mandojana, R. Antolín-López, I. Montiel, Connecting the Sustainable Development Goals to Firm-Level Sustainability and ESG Factors: The Need for Double Materiality, BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 26 (2022), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23409444221140919.
  3. S. Li, N. Xie, The Impact of Digital Finance on Firms' Digital Transformation: Mechanism Analysis Based on Enterprise Financing, Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 101 (2025), 104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104223.
  4. D.S. Bedford, D. Derichs, S. Hoozée, T. Malmi, M. Messner, et al., Digitalization of the Finance Function: Automation, Analytics, and Finance Function Effectiveness, Manag. Account. Res. 67 (2025), 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2025.100942.
  5. C. Lee, C. Wang, M.Y.I. Purnama, S.S. Sharma, Digitalization and Firms' Debt Maturity: Do Financial Constraints and Uncertainty Matter?, Pac.-Basin Financ. J. 85 (2024), 102399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102399.
  6. Y. Zhang, R. Liu, Digital Platform Economy, Financing Constraints, and Labor Market Economic Development, Financ. Res. Lett. 85 (2025), 108122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108122.
  7. B. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jia, F. Ma, Digital Finance, Financing Constraints, and Green Technological Innovation: A Spatial Analysis, Glob. Financ. J. 61 (2024), 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100988.
  8. M. Suttipun, T. Yordudom, Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosures on Market Reaction: An Evidence of Top50 Companies Listed from Thailand, J. Financ. Report. Account. 20 (2021), 753-767. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-12-2020-0377.
  9. PwC, Report on the results of the 11th Global Family Business Survey, Thailand Edition, 2023. https://www.pwc.com/th/en/services/EPB/family-business-survey-2023-th.html.
  10. B. Gipper, S. Ross, S.X. Shi, ESG Assurance in the United States, Rev. Account. Stud. 30 (2024), 1753-1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-024-09856-2.
  11. W. Chen, S. Srinivasan, Going Digital: Implications for Firm Value and Performance, Rev. Account. Stud. 29 (2023), 1619-1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-023-09753-0.
  12. M. Nasiri, M. Saunila, J. Ukko, Digital Orientation, Digital Maturity, and Digital Intensity: Determinants of Financial Success in Digital Transformation Settings, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 42 (2022), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-09-2021-0616.
  13. M. Spence, Job Market Signaling, Quart. J. Econ. 87 (1973), 355-374. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1882010.
  14. K.Y. Lo, C.L. Kwan, The Effect of Environmental, Social, Governance and Sustainability Initiatives on Stock Value – Examining Market Response to Initiatives Undertaken by Listed Companies, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 24 (2017), 606-619. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1431.
  15. G. Phung, H.H. Trinh, T.H. Nguyen, V.Q. Trinh, Top‐management Compensation and Environmental Innovation Strategy, Bus. Strat. Environ. 32 (2022), 1634-1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3209.
  16. H. Wang, L. Zhou, X. Liu, H. Li, Y. Liu, Digital Finance and New Quality Productive Force of Enterprise: Based on the Analysis of Enterprise Industrial and Commercial Big Data, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 104 (2025), 104303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104303.
  17. W. Xiao, Y. Tao, C. Li, Y. Ye, Does Digital Finance Mitigate Corporate Maturity Mismatch in China?, Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 80 (2025), 103153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103153.
  18. A. Del Giudice, S. Rigamonti, Does Audit Improve the Quality of ESG Scores? Evidence from Corporate Misconduct, Sustainability 12 (2020), 5670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145670.
  19. I. García‐Sánchez, N. Hussain, J. Martínez‐Ferrero, E. Ruiz‐Barbadillo, Impact of Disclosure and Assurance Quality of Corporate Sustainability Reports on Access to Finance, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 26 (2019), 832-848. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1724.
  20. J. Kokina, S. Blanchette, Early Evidence of Digital Labor in Accounting: Innovation with Robotic Process Automation, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst. 35 (2019), 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.100431.
  21. F. Shao, Z. Jiao, T. Jin, X. Zhu, Bridging the Gap: Digital Finance's Role in Addressing Maturity Mismatch in Investment and Financing for Agricultural Enterprises, Financ. Res. Lett. 64 (2024), 105415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105415.
  22. W.M.P. van der Aalst, M. Bichler, A. Heinzl, Robotic Process Automation, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60 (2018), 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4.
  23. G.W. Zheng, A.B. Siddik, M. Masukujjaman, N. Fatema, Factors Affecting the Sustainability Performance of Financial Institutions in Bangladesh: The Role of Green Finance, Sustainability 13 (2021), 10165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810165.
  24. H.U. Rahman, M. Zahid, M.A.S. Al-Faryan, ESG and Firm Performance: The Rarely Explored Moderation of Sustainability Strategy and Top Management Commitment, J. Clean. Prod. 404 (2023), 136859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136859.
  25. D. Reimsbach, R. Hahn, A. Gürtürk, Integrated Reporting and Assurance of Sustainability Information: An Experimental Study on Professional Investors’ Information Processing, Eur. Account. Rev. 27 (2017), 559-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2016.1273787.
  26. H. Chang, C.D. Ittner, M.T. Paz, The Multiple Roles of the Finance Organization: Determinants, Effectiveness, and the Moderating Influence of Information System Integration, J. Manag. Account. Res. 26 (2014), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50802.
  27. H. Jie, L.M. Gooi, Y. Lou, Digital Maturity, Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Performance in High-Tech SMEs, Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 99 (2025), 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103971.
  28. J. Namkhan, P. Songjarean, S. Sahunalu, The Relationship between Profitability and Executive Compensation of Listed Companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand, Rajapark J. 16 (2022), 342-355.
  29. M. Dahiya, S. Singh, The Linkage Between CSR and Cost of Equity: An Indian Perspective, Sustain. Account. Manag. Polic. J. 12 (2020), 499-521. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-10-2019-0379.
  30. S. Carnini Pulino, M. Ciaburri, B.S. Magnanelli, L. Nasta, Does ESG Disclosure Influence Firm Performance?, Sustainability 14 (2022), 7595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137595.
  31. M. Harasheh, R. Provasi, A Need for Assurance: Do Internal Control Systems Integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors?, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 30 (2022), 384-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2361.
  32. D. Izcan, E. Bektas, The Relationship Between ESG Scores and Firm-Specific Risk of Eurozone Banks, Sustainability 14 (2022), 8619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148619.
  33. C.J. Hadlock, J.R. Pierce, New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index, Rev. Financ. Stud. 23 (2010), 1909-1940. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq009.
  34. P. de Vincentiis, Do International Investors Care About ESG News?, Qual. Res. Financ. Mark. 15 (2022), 572-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-11-2021-0184.