The Influence of ESG Practices on Bank Credit: The Moderating Role of Climate Policy Across Countries

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-24-2026-56
Published: Feb 26, 2026
Cite as:
Ngoc Nguyen Bich, Duong Hoang Quynh, The Influence of ESG Practices on Bank Credit: The Moderating Role of Climate Policy Across Countries, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 24 (2026), 56.

Main Article Content

Ngoc Nguyen Bich, Duong Hoang Quynh

Abstract

This paper investigates how banks’ Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance interacts with national climate policy to shape bank credit, as measured by net loans. Using an unbalanced panel of 389 listed commercial banks from multiple countries over the period 2010–2023, we combine bank- level ESG and financial data with the Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI), a synthetic indicator of the ambition and effectiveness of national climate policy. The results of the two-step System-GMM show that, on average, stronger ESG performance and stricter climate policy are associated with a more cautious expansion of net loans. However, the positive, statistically significant interaction between ESG and CCPI indicates that the adverse baseline effect is attenuated as climate policy becomes more ambitious. Overall, the findings suggest that ESG alone is not a sufficient driver of green credit; its effectiveness as a conduit for sustainable lending critically depends on the broader climate policy framework.

Article Details

References

  1. UNEP FI, Principles for Responsible Banking – Progress Report 2022, UNEP FI, Geneva, 2022. https://www.unepfi.org/banking/bankingprinciples.
  2. S. Galletta, S. Mazzù, ESG Controversies and Bank Risk Taking, Bus. Strat. Environ. 32 (2022), 274-288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3129.
  3. E. Nizam, A. Ng, G. Dewandaru, R. Nagayev, M.A. Nkoba, The Impact of Social and Environmental Sustainability on Financial Performance: A Global Analysis of the Banking Sector, J. Multinatl. Financ. Manag. 49 (2019), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.01.002.
  4. S. Galletta, S. Mazzù, V. Naciti, A Bibliometric Analysis of ESG Performance in the Banking Industry: From the Current Status to Future Directions, Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 62 (2022), 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684.
  5. O. Abdelsalam, W. Azmi, M. Disli, V. Kowsalya, Bank Lending Cyclicality and ESG Activities: Global Evidence, Financ. Res. Lett. 58 (2023), 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104541.
  6. G.O. Danisman, A. Tarazi, ESG Activity and Bank Lending during Financial Crises, J. Financ. Stab. 70 (2024), 101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101206.
  7. A.R. AlHamrani, A. Awad, M. Albaity, Unveiling the Impact of ESG Disclosure on Bank Credit Growth, Econ. Res. Istraživanja 38 (2025), 269-309. https://doi.org/10.32728/er-ei.38.1.10.
  8. S. Li, X. Wu, How Does Climate Risk Affect Bank Loan Supply? Empirical Evidence from China, Econ. Chang. Restruct. 56 (2023), 2169-2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09505-9.
  9. Z. Pan, S. Li, J. Li, C. Gong, Air Pollution and Bank Risk Taking: Evidence from China, Financ. Res. Lett. 65 (2024), 105594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105594.
  10. S. Bressan, Environmental, Social, and Governance Scores and Loan Composition Inside United States Banks, Sustainability 16 (2024), 8075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188075.
  11. X.Y. Zhou, B. Caldecott, A.G.F. Hoepner, Y. Wang, Bank Green Lending and Credit Risk: An Empirical Analysis of China's Green Credit Policy, Bus. Strat. Environ. 31 (2022), 1623-1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2973.
  12. Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute, Climate Change Performance Index (CCPI) 2022, Germanwatch, Berlin, 2022. https://newclimate.org/resources/publications/climate-change-performance-index-2022.
  13. M. Spence, Job Market Signaling, Q. J. Econ. 87 (1973), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.
  14. R.E. Freeman, Strategic Management, Cambridge University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139192675.
  15. C. Wang, The Relationship Between ESG Performance and Corporate Performance - Based on Stakeholder Theory, SHS Web Conf. 190 (2024), 03022. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419003022.
  16. J. Dowling, J. Pfeffer, Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior, Pac. Sociol. Rev. 18 (1975), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226.
  17. M.C. Jensen, W.H. Meckling, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, J. Financ. Econ. 3 (1976), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  18. K. Herbohn, R. Gao, P. Clarkson, Evidence on Whether Banks Consider Carbon Risk in Their Lending Decisions, J. Bus. Ethics 158 (2019), 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3711-3.
  19. M. Wu, C. Shen, Corporate Social Responsibility in the Banking Industry: Motives and Financial Performance, J. Bank. Financ. 37 (2013), 3529-3547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.023.
  20. T. Brambor, W.R. Clark, M. Golder, Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses, Polit. Anal. 14 (2006), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014.
  21. P.P. Athanasoglou, S.N. Brissimis, M.D. Delis, Bank-Specific, Industry-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability, J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 18 (2008), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2006.07.001.
  22. M. Arellano, S. Bond, Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Rev. Econ. Stud. 58 (1991), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.
  23. M. Arellano, O. Bover, Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models, J. Econ. 68 (1995), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
  24. R. Blundell, S. Bond, Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models, J. Econ. 87 (1998), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
  25. F. Windmeijer, A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient Two-Step GMM Estimators, J. Econ. 126 (2005), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005.
  26. D. Roodman, How to Do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata, Stata J.: Promot. Commun. Stat. Stata 9 (2009), 86-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106.
  27. P. Bhowmik, Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of loan growth in commercial banks: A fixed effect model analysis. Journal of Management Accounting, Governance and Performance, 1(1), (2024), 92–112. https://doi.org/10. 63817/JMAGP.06.2024.007
  28. J. M. Berrospide, R. M. Edge, The Effects of Bank Capital On Lending: What Do We Know, and What Does It Mean? FEDS Working Paper No. 2010-44, (2010). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1895532.
  29. H.T. Hessou, R. Lensink, I. Soumaré, H. Tchakoute Tchuigoua, Provisioning Over the Business Cycle: Some Insights from the Microfinance Industry, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 77 (2021), 101825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101825.
  30. R. Arhinful, L. Mensah, B.A. Gyamfi, H.A. Obeng, The Impact of Non-Performing Loans on Bank Growth: The Moderating Roles of Bank Size and Capital Adequacy Ratio—Evidence from U.S. Banks, Int. J. Financ. Stud. 13 (2025), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13030165.
  31. E. Benincasa, G. Kabas, S. Ongena, “There is No Planet B", but for Banks “There are Countries B to Z": Domestic Climate Policy and Cross-Border Bank Lending, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 22-28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4075737.
  32. G. Covi, M. Froemel, D. Reinhardt, N. Wegner, Climate Policy and Banks’ Portfolio Allocation, Bank of England, (2025). https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/working-paper/2025/climate-policy-and-banks-portfolio-allocation.pdf.