Applications of Standard Methods for Solving the Electric Train Mathematical Model With Proportional Delay

Article Sidebar

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-20-2022-27
Published: Jun 2, 2022
Cite as:
S. M. Khaled, Applications of Standard Methods for Solving the Electric Train Mathematical Model With Proportional Delay, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 20 (2022), 27.

Main Article Content

S. M. Khaled

Abstract

In electric trains, the current is collected via a certain device, called the Pantograph. The governing mathematical model of such physical problem is well-known as the Pantograph delay differential equation (PDDE): y’(t)=ay(t)+by(ct), where c is a proportional delay parameter. In the literature, a special case of the PDDE was analyzed when c=−1. The objective of this paper is to determine the general solution of the PDDE for arbitrary c. In addition, it will be shown that the obtained general solution reduces to exact one at c=−1. Such exact solution is expressed in terms of several types of functions, e.g., hyberbolic, Mittag-Leffler, and trigonometric functions. Moreover, it is declared that the exact trigonometric solution is periodic with periodicity 2π/√b2−a2 which agrees with the corresponding results in the literature. Furthermore, the solution of PDDE is provided at almost all possible cases of the involved parameters a, b, and c. Finally, the solution Ambartsumian delay equation (ADE), which has an application in the theory of surface brightness in the Milky Way, will be recovered as a special case of our results.

Article Details

References

  1. H.I. Andrews, Third Paper: Calculating the Behaviour of an Overhead Catenary System for Railway Electrification, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 179 (1964), 809–846. https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1964_179_050_02.
  2. M.R. Abbott, Numerical Method for Calculating the Dynamic Behaviour of a Trolley Wire Overhead Contact System for Electric Railways, Computer J. 13 (1970), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/13.4.363.
  3. G. Gilbert, H.E.H. Davies, Pantograph Motion on a Nearly Uniform Railway Overhead Line, Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 113 (1966), 485-492. https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1966.0078.
  4. P.M. Caine, P.R. Scott, Single-Wire Railway Overhead System, Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. 116 (1969), 1217-1221. https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1969.0226.
  5. J.R. Ockendon, A.B. Tayler, The Dynamics of a Current Collection System for an Electric Locomotive, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 322 (1971), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1971.0078.
  6. V.A. Ambartsumian, On the Fluctuation of the Brightness of the Milky Way, Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR, 44 (1994), 223-226.
  7. J. Patade, S. Bhalekar, On Analytical Solution of Ambartsumian Equation, Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 40 (2017), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-017-0565-2.
  8. F.M. Alharbi, A. Ebaid, New Analytic Solution for Ambartsumian Equation, J. Math. Syst. Sci. 8 (2018), 182-186. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5291/2018.07.002.
  9. H. Bakodah, A. Ebaid, Exact Solution of Ambartsumian Delay Differential Equation and Comparison with DaftardarGejji and Jafari Approximate Method, Mathematics. 6 (2018), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120331.
  10. N.O. Alatawi, A. Ebaid, Solving a Delay Differential Equation by Two Direct Approaches, J. Math. Syst. Sci. 9 (2019), 54-56. https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5291/2019.02.003.
  11. A. Ebaid, A. Al-Enazi, B.Z. Albalawi, M.D. Aljoufi, Accurate Approximate Solution of Ambartsumian Delay Differential Equation via Decomposition Method, Math. Comput. Appl. 24 (2019), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca24010007.
  12. A.A. Alatawi, M. Aljoufi, F.M. Alharbi, A. Ebaid, Investigation of the Surface Brightness Model in the Milky Way via Homotopy Perturbation Method, J. Appl. Math. Phys. 8 (2020), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2020.83033.
  13. E. A. Algehyne, E. R. El-Zahar, F. M. Alharbi, A. Ebaid, Development of Analytical Solution for a Generalized Ambartsumian Equation, AIMS Math. 5 (2020), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2020016.
  14. S.M. Khaled, E.R. El-Zahar, A. Ebaid, Solution of Ambartsumian Delay Differential Equation with Conformable Derivative, Mathematics. 7 (2019), 425. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7050425.
  15. T. Kato, J.B. McLeod, The Functional-Differential Equation y’(x)=ay(λx)+by(x), Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1971), 891-935.
  16. A. Iserles, On the Generalized Pantograph Functional-Differential Equation, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 4 (1993), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956792500000966.
  17. G. Derfel, A. Iserles, The Pantograph Equation in the Complex Plane, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 213 (1997), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1997.5483.
  18. J. Patade, S. Bhalekar, Erratum to: Analytical Solution of Pantograph Equation with Incommensurate Delay, Phys. Sci. Rev. 3 (2018), 20165103. https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2016-9103.
  19. L. Fox, D.F. Mayers, J.R. Ockendon, A.B. Tayler, On a Functional Differential Equation, IMA J. Appl. Math. 8 (1971), 271–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamat/8.3.271.
  20. D. Kumar, J. Singh, D. Baleanu, S. Rathore, Analysis of a Fractional Model of the Ambartsumian Equation, Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 133 (2018), 259. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12081-3.
  21. A. Ebaid, C. Cattani, A.S. Al Juhani, E.R. El-Zahar, A Novel Exact Solution for the Fractional Ambartsumian Equation, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021 (2021), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03235-w.
  22. A. Ebaid, H.K. Al-Jeaid, On the Exact Solution of the Functional Differential Equation y’(t)=ay(t)+by(−t), Adv. Differ. Equ. Control Processes, 26 (2022), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.17654/0974324322003.