Enhancing Social Network Security Using Equitable Fair Edge Domination in Fuzzy Graphs

Main Article Content

E. Prabha, K. R. Balasubramanian, R. Navaneetha Krishnan, Tharmalingam Gunasekar

Abstract

In online social networks, cyber threats such as spam, phishing, and misinformation propagate through communication links, making security monitoring a critical challenge. Traditional approaches often lead to overburdening certain network connections, resulting in inefficient surveillance and increased vulnerability. To address this, we introduce the Fuzzy Regular Equitable Fair Domination Graph (FREFDG) and apply Equitable Fair Edge Domination (EFEDS) as a strategic model for balanced security monitoring. This framework ensures that security resources are distributed equitably across edges, thereby preventing overload and ensuring comprehensive threat detection. The theoretical foundations of EFEDS are rigorously established through propositions, theorems, and numerical illustrations, demonstrating its effectiveness in optimizing network surveillance. A decision-making model is formulated using graph-based analysis, enabling the systematic selection of critical edges requiring direct monitoring while leveraging indirect supervision for non-critical edges. This structured approach reduces computational complexity while enhancing network resilience. Additionally, we present a real-world application scenario, showcasing how EFEDS can be implemented in spam detection, phishing prevention, and misinformation filtering. The results demonstrate the efficiency of our framework in identifying high-risk edges, reducing redundant monitoring efforts, and improving threat mitigation strategies. By integrating fuzzy logic with equitable fair domination principles, our approach contributes to a more adaptive, scalable, and intelligent cybersecurity model, offering valuable insights for network security experts and researchers.

Article Details

References

  1. M.I. Ali, F. Feng, X. Liu, W.K. Min, M. Shabir, On Some New Operations in Soft Set Theory, Comput. Math. Appl. 57 (2009), 1547–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.11.009.
  2. A. Rosenfeld, Fuzzy Graphs, in: L.A. Zadeh, K.S. Fu, M. Shimura (Eds.), Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, Academic Press, 1975: pp. 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775260-0.50008-6.
  3. O. Manjusha, M. Sunitha, Notes on Domination in Fuzzy Graphs, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27 (2014), 3205–3212. https://doi.org/10.3233/ifs-141277.
  4. L. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Inf. Control. 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
  5. K.R. Bhutani, On Automorphisms of Fuzzy Graphs, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 9 (1989), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8655(89)90049-4.
  6. S. Samanta, M. Pal, Fuzzy Planar Graphs, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23 (2015), 1936–1942. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2387875.
  7. J.N. Mordeson, S. Mathew, D.S. Malik, Domination in Fuzzy Graphs, in: Fuzzy Graph Theory with Applications to Human Trafficking. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 365. Springer, Cham, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76454-2_2.
  8. K.R. Balasubramanian, K. Rajeswari, FUZZY COMPLEMENT OF Gc FOR A CONNECTED FUZZY GRAPH G, Adv. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 27 (2022), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.17654/0973421X22003.
  9. A.N. Gani, P. Vadivel, A Study on Domination, Independent Domination and Irredundance in Fuzzy Graph, Appl. Math. Sc. 5 (2011), 2317–2325.
  10. A.N.A. Koam, M. Akram, P. Liu, Decision-Making Analysis Based on Fuzzy Graph Structures, Math. Probl. Eng. 2020 (2020), 6846257. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6846257.
  11. O. Manjusha, M. Sunitha, Strong Domination in Fuzzy Graphs, Fuzzy Inf. Eng. 7 (2015), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fiae.2015.09.007.
  12. A. Anitha, S. Arumugam, M. Chellali, Equitable Domination in Graphs, Discret. Math. Algorithms Appl. 03 (2011), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793830911001231.
  13. S. Samanta, B. Sarkar, A Study on Generalized Fuzzy Graphs, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35 (2018), 3405–3412. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17285.
  14. A. Somasundaram, Domination in Products of Fuzzy Graphs, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst. 13 (2005), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218488505003394.
  15. O.T. Manjusha, M.S. Sunitha, Coverings, Matchings and Paired Domination in Fuzzy Graphs Using Strong Arcs, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 16 (2019), 145–157.
  16. A.N. Shain, M.M.Q. Shubatah, Inverse Dominating Set of an Interval-Valued Fuzzy Graphs, Asian J. Probab. Stat. 11 (2021), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2021/v11i330270.
  17. J.N. Mordeson, P.S. Nair, Fuzzy Graphs and Fuzzy Hypergraphs, Springer, (2000).
  18. K.G. Potadar, S.N. Pati, Fuzzy g$^{##}$-Connectedness in Fuzzy Topological Spaces, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. 5 (2019), 1017–1020. https://doi.org/10.29294/IJASE.5.3.2019.1017-1020.
  19. T. Gallai, Über extreme Punkt- und Kantenmengen, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest Eôtvôs Sect. Math. 2 (1959), 133–138.
  20. M.C. Golumbic, C.L. Monma, W.T. Trotter, Tolerance Graphs, Discret. Appl. Math. 9 (1984), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(84)90016-7.
  21. L.C. Samuel, M. Joseph, New Results on Connected Dominating Structures in Graphs, Acta Univ. Sapientiae, Inform. 11 (2019), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausi-2019-0004.
  22. F. Buckley, F. Harary, Distance in Graphs, Addison-Wesley, (1989).
  23. J.L. Gross, J. Yellen, Graph Theory and Its Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420057140.
  24. T. Gunasekar, K. Elavarasan, Study on Generalisation of Triple Connected Perfect Dominating Set in Fuzzy Graph, Int. J. Eng. Syst. Model. Simul. 1 (2022), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESMS.2022.10044615.